How Grok’s Deepfake Failures Are Creating New Parenting Risks in 2026

This piece explores why today’s AI‑driven deepfake crisis is fundamentally different from the parenting battles of past generations—and why the stakes are so much higher now.

⚠️ The Reality Behind the Image: This cheerful scene hides the truth: AI isn't just answering questions anymore. It's generating explicit content, targeting minors, and outpacing every safety measure parents once relied on.

As a young mother, I shielded my kids from porn's addictive pull—banning it entirely at home, as was common for my generation. Back then, porn was something that got smuggled in and hidden under mattresses. Today's parents face constant ads, commercials, and easy online access everywhere they turn. I don't envy them.

I once fought my local grocery store to move Hustler and Playboy behind the counter, per the law. That felt like a straightforward win—protecting kids was possible when the battle had clear boundaries.

In short, this is the parenting battle I never expected to face as a grandmother — and this article explains why deepfakes aren’t just the new “Hustler at the grocery store.”

But what's happening right now with Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok? This is a whole different ballgame. And it's relentless in ways I never could have imagined.

But what's happening right now with Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok? This is a whole different ballgame. And it's relentless in ways I never could have imagined.

What's Going On With Grok?

If you haven't been following the news, here's the quick version: Elon Musk's xAI launched an AI image generator called Grok that's integrated into his social media platform X (formerly Twitter). According to NBC News, Grok has been generating non-consensual sexualized deepfake images of real people—including minors—at an alarming rate.

Users were literally commanding Grok to "undress" women in photos, put them in revealing lingerie or transparent clothing, and create sexually explicit images without consent. Research from Fortune found that Grok was producing roughly 6,700 sexually suggestive images per hour, with 85% of its output being sexualized content.

Let that sink in: 6,700 images. Per hour.

Countries like Indonesia, Malaysia, and potentially the UK have banned or are considering banning Grok. The EU, California, and other jurisdictions have launched investigations. Even Ashley St. Clair—the mother of one of Musk's own children—has been victimized by the tool and is suing.

This Isn't Like Larry Flynt Winning Free Speech Cases

Now, I know what some people are thinking: "But what about free speech? Larry Flynt and Hugh Hefner fought for this, and they won."

Let me be clear: this is NOT the same thing.

In America, free speech protects most adult pornography under the First Amendment, as long as it's not obscene per the Miller test from 1973. Non-obscene porn—like Playboy-style softcore or even most modern adult content—is protected for consenting adults. Flynt and Hefner won key battles that established this.

But here's the critical difference: They were fighting for consensual adult material.

What Grok is doing involves:

• Non-consensual deepfakes of real people
• Harassment and revenge porn scenarios
• Child-like and minor images that approach or cross into CSAM (child sexual abuse material) territory

These are often illegal under revenge porn laws, CSAM statutes, and the new federal TAKE IT DOWN Act that Trump himself signed in May 2025.

📌 Bipartisan Action: The TAKE IT DOWN Act was introduced in the Senate by Ted Cruz with support from 11 Democrats and 10 Republicans, making it a rare bipartisan effort. Congress passed it in 2025, and President Trump signed it into law to address non‑consensual intimate deepfakes.

Why Parents Are Facing an Uphill Battle

When I was raising my kids, the threats were visible and containable. Magazines at the grocery store. VHS tapes. Dial-up internet that took forever to load anything.

Today? The threats are invisible, instant, and everywhere.

Studies show that porn can be addictive via dopamine cycles. According to recent reports, 71% of teens intentionally view porn weekly, with many experiencing their first exposure around age 12. The risks include compulsion, distorted views of relationships and sex, and mental health impacts.

And now we're adding AI-generated deepfakes to the mix—images that can be created of anyone, including children, with just a few text prompts.

But Parents Aren't Losing This Battle

Here's the truth: parents today can fight back effectively against online and offline porn influences. It's not a losing battle—but it is challenging, and it requires a completely different playbook than what worked for my generation.

Practical steps parents can take right now (2026 advice):

1. Use strong parental controls and filters on all devices, Wi-Fi routers, and browsers.
2. Set device rules that matter:
   • No phones or tablets in bedrooms or bathrooms
   • Charge devices in parents' room overnight
   • Public-area use only for younger kids
3. Have open, shame-free, age-appropriate talks early.
4. Monitor without invading privacy.
5. Limit screen time and educate on risks.

What About Grok Specifically?

xAI has made some changes under pressure. They've restricted real-person sexual edits and "undressing" features to paid users only, blocked CSAM creation, and implemented geoblocking in countries where this content is illegal.

But these are half-measures. The standalone Grok app still allows much of this functionality. Paid subscribers can still create deepfakes. The cat is out of the bag.

My advice: Avoid Grok entirely for kids and teens.

And here's something I'm wrestling with myself: I've been rethinking my own use of Grok. I love it for accuracy, speed, and up-to-date information—it's been a valuable tool for my research and writing. But do I want to support a platform that enables this type of activity?

If your kids are on X/Twitter, be aware that Grok is integrated directly into the platform. Monitor their use or consider whether they need to be on X at all.

The Bottom Line

Fighting my local grocery store to move Playboy behind the counter felt like a clear win back in the day. The rules were simple, the boundaries were visible, and I could protect my kids with straightforward action.

Today's parents don't have that luxury. The threats are more insidious, the technology more advanced, and the stakes potentially higher.

But you're not powerless. Proactive parenting combined with tech tools and open communication can significantly reduce exposure and impact.

Keep fighting. You're not losing.

— Alrady

Disclosure: I use AI (Claude) to help research, draft, and organize my posts. All opinions, experiences, and final content decisions are my own.

Image Credit: Image by Jörgherrich via Pixabay — https://pixabay.com/users/j%C3%B6rgherrich-40477882/

Grab a cuppa coffee and settle in — we’re diving into the stories, mysteries, and digital oddities that keep my curiosity buzzing.

Click the picture above if you’d like to support the blog.